首页> 外文OA文献 >Outcome evaluation of behavioral parent training and client-centered parent counseling for children with conduct problems.
【2h】

Outcome evaluation of behavioral parent training and client-centered parent counseling for children with conduct problems.

机译:对行为障碍儿童进行行为父母培训和以客户为中心的父母咨询的结果评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The central question addressed was, how effective is parent training in reducing conduct problems in children in comparison to client-centered parent counseling? A secondary question was the relative effectiveness of the two treatment groups in comparison to a wait control group that when untreated during the 8-week period of treatment provided the other groups. Families of 36, 5- to 12-year-old conduct problem children were screened and assigned at random to treatment groups, but wait control group assignment depended upon therapist availability. Supervised graduate student therapists conducted 10 treatment sessions for each family. Parent reports and paper and pencil tests of child deviance and parent satisfaction showed a superior outcome for behavioral over the client-centered and wait control groups, and no differences between the latter two groups. At follow-up there was no maintenance of this superiority. Home observation data showed no advantage of behavioral over client-centered treatment, and these two groups did not improve significantly more than the wait control group. These results were discussed in the light of possible interactions between treatment and measurement, and methodological and sampling differences between this and other studies.
机译:解决的中心问题是,与以客户为中心的家长辅导相比,家长培训在减少儿童行为方面的效果如何?第二个问题是与等待对照组相比,两个治疗组的相对有效性,而等待对照组在8周的治疗期内不治疗时,其他组则相对。筛选了36、5至12岁行为有问题的儿童的家庭,并随机分配给治疗组,但是等待对照组的分配取决于治疗师的可用性。受监督的研究生治疗师为每个家庭进行了10次治疗。父母的报告以及对孩子的偏差和父母满意度的纸笔测验显示,其行为表现优于以客户为中心的和等待的对照组,后两组之间没有差异。在随访中,没有保持这种优势。家庭观察数据显示,与以服务对象为中心的治疗相比,行为方面没有优势,并且这两组患者的改善没有比等待对照组显着提高。鉴于治疗和测量之间可能存在的相互作用以及本研究与其他研究之间的方法学和抽样差异,对这些结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号